Does the Physics of the 21 century need ...
Home
Book a Flight
Flight Prices
Special Offers!
Price Guarantee
Price a Flight
- Order Process
Calendar
Zero-G Flights
Gift Certificates
Hotels
Spb. Hotels

Why FlyMiG.Com?
Aircraft
In the Media
Contact Us
Questions
Flight Stories
About Us
MAKS 2003
MAKS 2005
Updates

Avia X-change
Aviation Forum
Cool Stuff
Affiliates
Mail Lists
iPod
PostCards
Search
Links
Aviation Books
Videos
Wallpaper



 Russian Visa online


RC Clubs
Code your Mac
Manuals
 
Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

Does the Physics of the 21 century need the uncertainty principle?
Wednesday, November 10, 2004 (9:04 PM)

Reply to this threadRSS Feed
Posted by
knitek (1)
Edit
Does the Physics of the 21 century need the uncertainty principle?
PLEASE READ THIS FIRST PAR. FIRST. re: Russian and American.
We are all mankind there is no difference b/w any race of any geographical location to another.We are very adaptive relatively. And each seemingly does fine in an area of interest. I humbly admit that some are more focused and dedicated than others. When you realise the need for something been of good courage you shall be moved to do something. Ones rendition now becomes an obligation to change something. And that doesnt make you any better that the African or the Jewish person. Youa re only a good for nothing man becaus you did your work aright.

I am worried about the stagnation in Physics. Vis-a-vis the lesser growth we have experienced in Technology itself. Since 1940 or around that time till now. I mean there has not been anything spectacular after Eistein. The hydrogen bomb was the begining of the nuclear era. We have emplored Photoelectric effect in everything from LCD TO LASER. Man still lack a full understanding of E=mc^2 and the man that came about it.

We have not travelled at the speed of light according to his (Einstein' genius) proposition. Giving two light seperated locations: Light itself could have become a signal carrying data. We can travel at the speed of light possibly when our information could do so. Man would/ could have been dreaming of doing so in the most spectacular and physical manner. The masses in the nuclear explosions have achieved such travel at the speed of light. We have not been able to do with light what we did with the electrons. Our circuitry channels({chips)) as little as (micro) they span have been exhausted. Our sciences have reached a retardation since we lack conceptual innovation. Science needs no limitation of suspected unsuitable or primitive tools.

The road to better technology is in harnessing the energy not only/readily available within the visible spectrum of the electromagnetic field. It also lies on going beyond our conceptual limitations of such time. Bringing and proving right what others fear to believe in. Yes! the ground work of Eisntein and Newton can lead us to the place we crave. Why Newton? You may say that the action at a distance was a flaw. It was until Einstein. Newton brought the law of universal gravitation to the world. The classical physics which cradled Einstein until he became courageous to change the way we think. The Light theory paved the way to special theory of relativity and the relativity theory itself. If man can thread on the relativistic gravity or Einstenian gravity in comparison to maxwell's equation of electromagnetic field.

Respecting a uniformly accelerated coordinate system. One must take into account The Euclidean sense of space, lorentz transformation and light theory(with a mind strong enough to disregard the unfavourable supposition of light travelling at similar speed in any cordinate system giving the changes in x =distance). Imbibing all this in one partial differential equation will mean much even to Einstein. More work need to be done on gravity. Since the gravity is the force that keeps us on planet earth. Is there any possibility that this gravity is perversive and it exerts to the utmost distance? Must it not have gone within the atoms themselves as naturally tranformed since the universe is dynamic. What actually is the strong nuclear force keeping protons and neutrons together?

These photons evenly distributed along the wave front can be manipulated. Or better yet Einstein' photons could not have been only massless. The photons are not exempted from the law of conservation of energy. Only now that we understand the continous tranformation of mass-energy(that suggests the expansion of the universe). And the difficulties why we have not trapped light yet. The good news is, there is a pattern in everything we can find in nature. If you are interested or you do know any professor interested in my proposition as a man concerned I will be very happy to gain more knowledge from him.I forgot something .the Uncertainty principle. Please do not be offended sir. I must continue with all of you on that another time.

Reply to this threadRSS Feed

Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

Home | Book a Flight | Flight Prices | Special Offers! | Price Guarantee | Price a Flight | - Order Process | Calendar | Zero-G Flights | Gift Certificates | Hotels | Spb. Hotels

Why FlyMiG.Com? | Aircraft | In the Media | Contact Us | Questions | Flight Stories | About Us | MAKS 2003 | MAKS 2005 | Updates

Avia X-change | Aviation Forum | Cool Stuff | Affiliates | Mail Lists | iPod | PostCards | Search | Links | Pilots

Del.icio.usDiggYahoo.RedditSlashDotTechnoratiTwitterBlinkListConnoteaFaceBookFurlGoogle.NewsVinePropeller.StumbleUponWindows Live


Honda CRX Si | Manuals |
   Copyright © FlyMiG.Com™ 2002 - 2024