Defence - quetions!
Home
Book a Flight
Flight Prices
Special Offers!
Price Guarantee
Price a Flight
- Order Process
Calendar
Zero-G Flights
Gift Certificates
Hotels
Spb. Hotels

Why FlyMiG.Com?
Aircraft
In the Media
Contact Us
Questions
Flight Stories
About Us
MAKS 2003
MAKS 2005
Updates

Avia X-change
Aviation Forum
Cool Stuff
Affiliates
Mail Lists
iPod
PostCards
Search
Links
Aviation Books
Videos
Wallpaper



 Russian Visa online


RC Clubs
Code your Mac
Manuals
 
Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

Defence - quetions!
Tuesday, December 28, 2004 (8:53 AM)

Reply to this threadRSS Feed
Posted by
Sukhoy (488)
Edit
Defence - quetions!
What is the longest range at russian's ICBM? And USA's?

Missile defence failed in USA.

If any ICBM come to USA's territory how can be intercept? What kind of solutions will adopt in such a short time?

Same question in Russia case. Will intercept with MiG-31? Or with SAMs?

Russia said new Topol-M will not be interceptible by any antibalistic missile, now and in near wuture?


Posted by
Sukhoy (488)
Edit
RE: Defence - quetions!
Posted: January 1, 2005 (1:38 PM)
And S-500? Is in development?

Posted by
Sukhoy (488)
Edit
RE: Defence - quetions!
Posted: January 4, 2005 (6:20 AM)
Ok S-xxx is SAM the simpliest mode to intercept an ICBM. Can any aircraft (MiG-29, 31 Su-27,30,33,35) intercept with their missiles an ICBM? Same questions on NATO case!

Posted by
hello (109)
Edit
RE: Defence - quetions!
Posted: February 11, 2005 (6:54 PM)
my question is: Why would one want to intercept ICBM?
If it is on the path - it's already too late for anything. Weather you intercept it or not - it's gonna blow! When that happenes - 100 miles before or after doesn't make much of a difference! And it's not coming alone. There will be more of them coming after.

Today ICBMs could be blown in their own Countries and it will be total! An hour later or an hour earlier - all winners and losers will be at the same place!
Let's pray we will never see them flying!


Posted by
JSF_fan (48)
Edit
RE: Defence - quetions!
Posted: February 17, 2006 (4:33 AM)
Nuclear warheads can't actually explode when intercepted in mid air. Why? Go read some basic information about nuclear weapons and you will know what I am saying. and in the past scuds and V-2s have been intercepted, although damn hard to do it is possible.

Posted by
Sukhoy (488)
Edit
RE: Defence - quetions!
Posted: February 17, 2006 (4:43 AM)
Right, in case of nuke war, ICBM come not alone. But in case of accident?
Reply to this threadRSS Feed

Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

Home | Book a Flight | Flight Prices | Special Offers! | Price Guarantee | Price a Flight | - Order Process | Calendar | Zero-G Flights | Gift Certificates | Hotels | Spb. Hotels

Why FlyMiG.Com? | Aircraft | In the Media | Contact Us | Questions | Flight Stories | About Us | MAKS 2003 | MAKS 2005 | Updates

Avia X-change | Aviation Forum | Cool Stuff | Affiliates | Mail Lists | iPod | PostCards | Search | Links | Pilots

Del.icio.usDiggYahoo.RedditSlashDotTechnoratiTwitterBlinkListConnoteaFaceBookFurlGoogle.NewsVinePropeller.StumbleUponWindows Live


Honda CRX Si | Manuals |
   Copyright © FlyMiG.Com™ 2002 - 2024