which is higher?


		which is higher?

Home

Book a Flight

Flight Prices

Special Offers!

Price Guarantee

Price a Flight

- Order Process

Calendar

Zero-G Flights

Gift Certificates

Hotels

Spb. Hotels

Why FlyMiG.Com?
Aircraft
In the Media
Contact Us
Questions
Flight Stories
About Us
MAKS 2003
MAKS 2005
Updates

Avia X-change
Aviation Forum
Cool Stuff
Affiliates
Mail Lists
iPod
PostCards
Search
Links
Aviation Books
Videos
Wallpaper

RC Clubs
Code your Mac
Manuals

Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

which is higher?
Sunday, March 20, 2005 (11:30 PM)

Reply to this thread

1 | 2 Next...

Posted by Tupolev (13) Edit	which is higher?
	Which one is technologically higher, building an advanced submarine or an advanced fighter?

Posted by Sukhoy (488) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (9:18 AM)
	The submarines are the most sophysticated things ever build, by russians and americans - both. The aircraft required higher technology too but not like for subs.

Posted by FireFly (47) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (9:54 AM)
	What's more complicated in their body? A chicken? or a Fish? All have their unique creation. That's what I think.

Posted by Sukhoy (488) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (9:59 AM)
	In general subs are considered most sophysticated. Why any country have aircrafts but only few have subs? Subs are not only steal!

Posted by FireFly (47) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:06 AM)
	It's better to ask: Why most countries can afford an air-fleet while not submarines? Yes, Submarine technology is very complicated, but aviation and its radars are complicated as well. Put in mind the high speed airplanes fly with. It's hard to design super-agile missiles in high speed. Got my point?

Posted by Sukhoy (488) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:18 AM)
	You partialy are right. But why not any country have subs? Are very expensive. Why? Because are only steal? I think sonar are more sophysticated than radar.

Posted by FireFly (47) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:32 AM)
	Maybe you are right. but Who needs submarines but a Superpower Nation? It's like a BONUS warmachine

Posted by
Sukhoy (488)
Edit

RE: which is higher?
Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:45 AM)

Need subs only country that have it and built it.

My country (Romania) have one - Delfinul, soviet sub.
But we don't need it.
Govement once wanted to sold it and with money buy aircraft, sure americans'. Because we accepeted in NATO and we must now do averything USA want.

An soldier killed (was drunk) with a car (in accident) a romanian artist.
USA bring soldier back and.
HE IS AMERICAN, so HE IS GOD. F**K USA.
I want see in USA like what USA made in the world.
ONLY PAIN, AND PAIN AND PAIN AND AGAIN ONLY PAIN.

That's I am russian side. But remember --- Russia must give Romania some 80 tones of gold. Putin said he don't know anythink about that.

However USA is a DEVIL RUSSIA (USSR) WAS.

Posted by FireFly (47) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:50 AM)
	I can feel you man. I can feel you 100% God help us all.

Posted by Sukhoy (488) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:52 AM)
	You are bulgarian, my neighbourghood?

Posted by FireFly (47) Edit	RE: which is higher? Posted: March 21, 2005 (10:55 AM)
	Yeah, human is the highest technology ever!

Reply to this thread

1 | 2 Next...

Main Forum Page | Start new Thread | Edit your AD | Search Forum

Honda CRX Si | Manuals |